Course: General Term
Objections in trial law are formal statements made by lawyers to challenge the admissibility of evidence or questions and ensure a fair trial.
In the trial law context, objections are formal statements made by a lawyer during a trial to challenge the admissibility of evidence or the legality of a question or argument made by opposing counsel. Their purpose is to ensure that the trial proceeds in a fair and just manner by preventing evidence or arguments that are improper or irrelevant from being considered by the judge or jury.
One common type is an objection to hearsay. Hearsay is an out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted and is generally not admissible as evidence in court. If a lawyer believes that a witness is testifying about hearsay, they may make an objection to prevent the evidence from being admitted.
Another common type is an objection to relevance. Evidence that is not relevant to the issues in the case is generally not admissible in court. If a lawyer believes that the opposing counsel is introducing evidence that is irrelevant, they may make an objection to prevent the evidence from being admitted.
They can also be made on the basis of legal grounds, such as objections to the admissibility of evidence obtained through an illegal search or seizure or objections to the use of evidence obtained in violation of a defendant’s constitutional rights.
In addition, lawyers may also make objections on the basis of procedural rules. For example, if a lawyer believes that the opposing counsel is harassing or badgering a witness, they may make an objection to prevent the opposing counsel from continuing the line of questioning.
They are typically made orally, in open court, and must be made at the appropriate time in order to be considered by the judge. If it is sustained by the judge, it means that the evidence or argument in question is not admissible and cannot be considered by the jury. If it is overruled by the judge, it means that the evidence or argument in question is admissible and can be considered by the jury.
Objections can be a powerful tool in the trial law context, as they can prevent improper or irrelevant evidence from being considered by the jury and can help to ensure that the trial proceeds in a fair and just manner. However, objections must be made carefully and strategically, as making too many objections can be seen as disruptive or argumentative and can harm the credibility of the lawyer making the objections.
[ Glossary ]
Last Modified: 04/27/2023