Mempa v. Rhay (1967) | Definition

Doc's CJ Glossary by Adam J. McKee
Course: Introduction / Corrections / Procedural Law 

Mempa v. Rhay (1967) is a landmark SCOTUS decision in which the Court decided that a probationer has the right to counsel in a hearing where a suspended prison sentence may be imposed.

Mempa v. Rhay is a landmark decision made by the United States Supreme Court in 1967. This decision is significant because it established the right to counsel for individuals who are facing the imposition of a suspended prison sentence while on probation. Prior to this decision, there was no requirement for the provision of legal counsel to probationers during these types of hearings.

In Mempa v. Rhay, the petitioner, Jack Mempa, was placed on probation for burglary in the State of Washington. While on probation, Mempa was arrested for another burglary offense and was subsequently charged with violating the conditions of his probation. The State of Washington then initiated a hearing to determine whether to revoke Mempa’s probation and impose a suspended sentence of up to 20 years in prison.

At the hearing, Mempa was not provided with legal counsel and was not informed of his right to counsel. He subsequently pleaded guilty to the probation violation and was sentenced to serve the suspended sentence. Mempa appealed the decision, arguing that he was denied his constitutional right to counsel during the probation revocation hearing.

The Supreme Court ultimately agreed with Mempa and held that the Sixth Amendment right to counsel applies to probation revocation hearings. The Court reasoned that probationers facing the possibility of a suspended sentence have a significant interest at stake, as a suspended sentence can result in a significant loss of liberty. Therefore, the Court held that the right to counsel was necessary to ensure that probationers receive a fair and meaningful hearing.

The decision in Mempa v. Rhay has had significant implications for the criminal justice system. It has helped to establish the importance of providing legal counsel to individuals facing the imposition of a suspended prison sentence while on probation, ensuring that they receive a fair and just hearing. Additionally, the decision has helped to protect the constitutional rights of probationers and has helped to ensure that they are treated fairly and justly within the criminal justice system.

Since the decision in Mempa v. Rhay, the right to counsel has been extended to other areas of the criminal justice system. For example, defendants facing misdemeanor charges may be entitled to legal counsel under certain circumstances, and juveniles facing delinquency proceedings are also entitled to legal counsel.

Learn More

On This Site

[ Glossary ]

Last Modified: 04/25/2023

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.