The Federal Rules of Evidence are rules established by the SCOTUS in an effort to codify the many rules of presenting evidence in federal criminal courts; many states have adopted these for use in state courts.
The Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE) is a set of rules established by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) to govern the presentation of evidence in federal criminal courts. The FRE was enacted in 1975 with the goal of codifying the various rules of evidence that had been developed over time through case law. The FRE is designed to ensure that evidence is presented in a fair and consistent manner while also promoting the truth-seeking function of the trial.
The FRE applies to all federal criminal trials and hearings, as well as to civil cases in federal court. Many state courts have also adopted the FRE or some version of them for use in their own court systems.
The FRE covers a wide range of topics, including the admissibility of evidence, the burden of proof, and the use of expert witnesses. The rules also address issues such as hearsay, authentication of evidence, and the use of demonstrative evidence.
One of the key goals of the FRE is to ensure that evidence is presented in a reliable and trustworthy manner. To that end, the rules establish certain requirements that must be met before evidence can be admitted at trial. For example, the proponent of the evidence must be able to demonstrate that it is relevant to the case at hand and that it is reliable. In addition, the rules provide for the exclusion of evidence that is unfairly prejudicial, confusing, or misleading.
The FRE also seeks to balance the need for relevant evidence with the need to protect certain types of information. For example, the rules provide for the exclusion of evidence that is protected by privilege, such as attorney-client communications or communications between spouses. The rules also address issues such as the admissibility of evidence obtained through illegal searches or seizures.
While the FRE provides a framework for the presentation of evidence in federal courts, they are not inflexible. Judges are often called upon to make rulings on the admissibility of evidence based on the specific circumstances of each case. In addition, the rules are subject to interpretation and modification by the courts and by Congress.
On This Site
On Other Sites
- Read the full text on the Legal Information Institute’s Website
[ Glossary ]
Last Modified: 04/18/2023