contempt (of court) | Definition

Doc's CJ Glossary by Adam J. McKee
Course: Law

Contempt of court is disrespecting or obstructing the court’s authority, punishable by fines or imprisonment, depending on the severity.

Contempt of court is a legal term that refers to a behavior that disrespects or obstructs the functioning of the court. This disregard can take several forms, including but not limited to defying a court order, disrupting court proceedings, or failing to appear in court when required. The concept of contempt of court is critical to the maintenance of the authority, respect, and integrity of the judicial system.

Forms of Contempt

Broadly speaking, there are two main forms of contempt of court: civil and criminal. Civil contempt usually involves failing to comply with a court order. For instance, if a court orders a person to pay child support and they refuse to do so, they may be held in civil contempt. The primary purpose of civil contempt is to compel obedience to court orders and maintain the court’s authority.

On the other hand, criminal contempt involves behavior that disrupts or obstructs the functioning of the court. This could be something as simple as repeatedly talking over the judge or as serious as threatening or intimidating a witness. The purpose of criminal contempt is to preserve the dignity and respect of the courtroom and to punish inappropriate conduct.

Consequences of Contempt

Contempt of court is considered a serious offense because it undermines the authority of the judiciary. Depending on the jurisdiction and the severity of the contemptuous conduct, penalties for contempt of court can range from fines to imprisonment. For example, someone who yells in court might be fined, while someone who threatens a witness might be sentenced to jail time.

In some cases, contempt can be punished “summarily,” meaning the judge has the authority to impose a punishment immediately. This is often the case for disruptions that happen in the courtroom, where the judge can see and respond to the behavior directly.

However, not all such charges are dealt with summarily. In other cases, a person accused of contempt may have the right to a hearing. This allows the person an opportunity to present a defense before any punishment is imposed. This is particularly common in cases of alleged civil contempt, where the issue might be whether the person was capable of complying with the court’s order.

Respect for the Judicial System

Ultimately, the concept of contempt of court reflects the respect and deference our society accords to the judicial system. Courts have the responsibility of interpreting and applying the law, a task that requires order, respect, and compliance from all parties involved. By enforcing penalties for contempt, courts ensure they maintain the authority necessary to carry out their duties effectively.

However, as with any power, the ability to hold someone in contempt must be exercised judiciously. There is a delicate balance to be maintained between upholding the court’s authority and ensuring that an individual’s rights are not violated. This balance is a cornerstone of the judicial system, reinforcing the importance of both respects for the court and the protection of individual liberties.

[ Glossary ]

Last Modified: 05/14/2023


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.