Boykin v. Alabama

Boykin v. Alabama was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1969. In this case, the Court addressed the issue of whether a defendant’s plea of guilty is valid if it is not made voluntarily and intelligently.

The Court ruled that a plea of guilty is not valid if it is not made voluntarily and intelligently. In order for a plea to be considered voluntary and intelligent, the defendant must understand the nature of the charges against them and the potential consequences of their plea. The Court held that, before accepting a plea of guilty, a court must ensure that the defendant is aware of their rights and understands their plea’s implications.

This case is significant in the criminal justice context because it established that defendants must be fully informed of their rights and must understand the consequences of their plea in order for their guilty plea to be valid. This helps to ensure that defendants are not coerced into pleading guilty and that they are able to make an informed decision about their plea.

[ Glossary ]


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Professor McKee's Things and Stuff uses Accessibility Checker to monitor our website's accessibility.